"Why is Animal Agriculure Subsidised?"

This article is part of my FAQs series.

For well over a decade, I have been answering anonymously submitted questions on my Tumblr blog. Over that time, I have noticed many recurring themes, concerns, and misunderstandings.

This series brings together concise, practical responses to the questions I am asked most often, based on real conversations with people at every stage of thinking about veganism.

If you’d like to see more entries in this series, you can find them here.

The Short Answer

Many governments subsidise agriculture, including livestock production, for historical and economic reasons. These policies developed during periods when governments were trying to stabilise food supplies, protect farmers from market volatility, and ensure that food remained affordable.

Over time, some of these subsidies have come to support the production of animal products directly or indirectly, particularly through subsidies for feed crops such as corn and soy. Critics argue that this system distorts food prices and encourages higher production of animal products than the market might otherwise support.

Understanding why these subsidies exist requires looking at their historical origins and how agricultural policy has evolved.

The Detail

Historical Origins of Agricultural Subsidies

Modern agricultural subsidy systems largely developed during the early twentieth century. In the United States, a major turning point came during the Great Depression.

During the 1920s and early 1930s, agricultural production increased dramatically. Farmers had expanded production during and after the First World War to supply both domestic markets and war affected regions in Europe. When demand later fell, large surpluses drove crop prices sharply downward.

Governments faced a difficult situation, since falling prices threatened the livelihoods of farmers and created instability in rural economies. In response, policies were introduced to stabilise agricultural markets. These included minimum price supports, payments for leaving some land unplanted, and other forms of financial assistance.

What began as emergency economic measures gradually developed into long term agricultural policy.

The Role of Feed Crops

A significant share of agricultural subsidies in many countries goes to crops such as corn, soybeans, and other grains – particularly in the West. These crops have many uses, but a large proportion is used as feed for livestock.

Because feed crops can receive government support through price guarantees, insurance programs, or other subsidies, the cost of raising animals for meat and dairy is significantly lower than it would be without these policies. In this way, these industries are at least partially protected from market forces.

This does not necessarily mean that governments explicitly subsidise meat or dairy in every case. However, support for feed production can indirectly lower the cost of producing animal products, and thus make animal products more affordable for consumers.

Political and Economic Factors

Agricultural policy is influenced by a wide range of political and economic pressures. Farming organisations and food industries often have significant influence in policy discussions. At the same time, governments are sensitive to the cost of food for consumers and the economic health of rural communities.

Reducing or removing subsidies can therefore be politically difficult. If subsidies were removed abruptly, food prices could rise in the short term and some farming businesses might struggle to adapt. Animal agriculture industries also have very powerful political lobbies, making it difficult for politicans to pass legislation that is not in their interests.

Agricultural Subsidies Around the World

Agricultural subsidies are not unique to one country. Many developed economies maintain large agricultural support programs.

In the United States, farm subsidies amount to billions of dollars each year through various programs administered under federal farm legislation. In the European Union, the Common Agricultural Policy provides financial support to farmers across member states and represents a substantial share of the EU budget.

Other countries operate similar programs designed to stabilise agricultural markets, maintain domestic food production, and support rural economies.

Criticism and Ongoing Debate

Agricultural subsidies are the subject of ongoing debate among economists, environmental researchers, and public health experts.

Critics argue that some subsidies encourage overproduction of certain commodities, distort market prices, and contribute to environmental pressures associated with intensive agriculture. Others argue that subsidies remain necessary to maintain food security, protect farmers from unpredictable markets, and ensure stable food supplies.

In recent years, some researchers and policymakers have proposed shifting more agricultural support toward crops intended for direct human consumption, environmental restoration, or sustainable farming practices.

If we did this, advocates argue, we would be able to feed more people using less land, few resources and at a lower environmental impact. With these subsidies in place, healthy plant-based food would become far more affordable for the average consumer.

Support independent, research-based advocacy

Helping keep free, educational content online

No ads, no paywalls, no affiliate links

Donate

“Why is Animal Agriculure Subsidised?”